this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2023
627 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

59454 readers
4054 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Natanael 1 points 1 year ago

But back to your question. There are already rumors that NSA is using super fast traditional computers to calculate prime numbers and collect them in a database to make cracking traditional encryption easier.

The only thing I can think about with is is that for the NSA they are not moving quickly enough to catch up or they suspect any future quantum key encryption will thwart any attempts they made

RSA1024 is presumed to be breakable (was the default for decades), while RSA1280 (used by iMessage) is presumed to be near the limit of what an agency like NSA could break, and 2048 or 4096 is the medium term standard while long term it's either ECC or post quantum algorithms.

Today most of the cat and mouse game is about protocol design security and implementions. Just look at sidechannel attacks.