this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2023
162 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37692 readers
353 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The news isn’t a surprise as Unity angered a lot of its loyal game developers a few weeks ago after pushing through a price increase based on numbers of downloads — and then retracted it after an uproar.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If they had initially introduced a normal revenue share system like they're offering now, very few people would have complained. I find the notion that this was all a deliberate move from Unity rather silly. The only thing it achieved was serious damage to their reputation (which wasn't great in the first place).

[–] norgur@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago

Oh, it is silly and it is stupid. Yet, it's how EA acted under Johnny here. That's the time they were regularly voted as the worst US company. They pulled this with so many things ("Fun surprise mechanics")

[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

It can be both. It can be a deliberate, albiet stupid move. I think that they always intended to walk back the initial offer, they just bit off more than they could chew.