this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
97 points (93.7% liked)

Asklemmy

43394 readers
1414 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

When I’m unhappy, I feel like I’m doing life wrong. I’d rather be happy. But is happiness the point of life, or is there more to it? If I pursue happiness, mine first then for those around me, is that selfish? But if there’s a bigger purpose, then what about people with Alzheimer’s or dementia who can’t recall recent experiences or make plans?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] spauldo@lemmy.ml 15 points 11 months ago (3 children)

The only objective purpose in life is to spread your genes. You share that same purpose with every other living thing.

Other than that, it's up to you. My purpose in life is to keep my girlfriend happy and destroy as many jobs as I can. My career in industrial automation is the key to both.

[–] SmokeInFog@midwest.social 18 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

The only objective purpose in life is to spread your genes.

Not even that. It's not like you've failed at life if you don't have kids. You just haven't spread your genetic information. Saying that its your purpose to spread them implies it's the genes purpose to be spread. Genes simply are, they don't have a purpose just like you don't; evolution has just given organisms behaviors and mechanisms that make it very likely that they will be regardless of that lack of purpose.

[–] spauldo@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

That's a valid way of looking at it, too.

Realistically, the concept of "purpose" doesn't exist in the universe outside of our imagination any more than justice, beauty, or morality. Things just are what they are and follow the laws of physics.

If we're making it all up as we go along, there aren't any wrong answers. I claim the purpose of living things is to reproduce, but it's true that living things reproduce because that's what living things do (otherwise we'd have run out of them by now). Kind of a chicken/egg thing there.

[–] fubo@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

The only objective purpose in life is to spread your genes. You share that same purpose with every other living thing.

That's not my purpose; it's my genes' purpose.

(Similarly, any one of my somatic cells could "decide" to "pursue the goal" of spreading its own genes instead of cooperating with the other tissues and organs around it. We call that "cancer".)

[–] yote_zip@pawb.social 11 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Just my luck, the only objective purpose in life doesn't work as a gay guy. I'm going to try the destroying jobs thing instead.

[–] Nemo@midwest.social 5 points 11 months ago

You can still pass on your memes!

[–] fubo@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

If society is an organism, you're a somatic cell rather than a germ cell. You're an important part of multicellular life!

[–] spauldo@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

It's fun! And it pays well. Get your engineering or comp sci degree and give me a call.