this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2022
10 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43898 readers
976 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Possibly stupid question, but why not stop e-mail spam in the same way we do IMs?

I don't see how I could ever get spam-messages from, e.g. an xmpp account. Worst-case scenario is that I get a bunch of 'subscription' requests, and I can only add friends when I trawl through the requests, or if I know they're adding a request at the time, then look out for that request.

Emails seem to let everything in, with a reliance on the admin to sort this out. Why not do the same thing?

Specifically, I'm thinking of writing a script:

  1. If this person's in my contact-list, they're cool.
  2. If they're on the shit-list, they're deleted.
  3. If not, they get into the 'waiting room'.

... then set up a shortcut to put someone on the shit-list. So there's no more 'you've got mail' notifications from random spammers, and I can review it once a week or so to pull the good-guys out.

Seems like a good idea, but then I wondered, why hasn't this been done before? If the script works, it seems like someone could do the same thing with a GUI.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dressupgeekout@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Spam detection is HARD to get right. How do you ensure your spam filter never has false positives? How do you know #2 on your list won't cause problems later? And most people don't have time for item #3, sifting through everything in the 'waiting room' which will never be empty.

Your system seems to implement a whitelist of people who would be even allowed to contact you. That goes against the fundamental "push" nature of email, if you see what I mean. Remember that just because an email is unsolicited, doesn't mean it's spam.

[–] Ghast@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

How do you know #2 on your list won’t cause problems later

Same attitude as a blocklist, broadly. Once someone's on the shit-list, you just need to be okay with those messages lying in the bin, unseen.

That goes against the fundamental “push” nature of email,

Yea, that's what I'm going for. It seems to work for IMs. And if someone emails me from nowhere, offering wonderful things, I'll get back to them late, but don't have to get a 'ding' from all the random crap.