this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
-9 points (37.8% liked)

Asklemmy

44162 readers
1504 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
-9
Emojis and Lemmy (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
 

Does anyone else think having emojis as a response to a comment/thread would be a neat addition instead of only upvote/downvote?

Reddit seemed to sorta do that with awards but thats not quite what I'm suggesting.

Something similar to GitHub for instance, except we keep the upvote downvote system as-is.

This would hopefully discourage the use of upvote/downvote as a "I like/dislike this" button while also adding the ability to more accurately express the emotion the post/comment illicited

Additionally, there are a lot of people who are mostly just lurkers and have no desire to post, but they want to be able to emote further then just a upvote/downvote but DON'T want to actually post a comment like "I love this" or "You're so right" or even just commenting an emoji, because making a comment is a whole extra action that makes them visible, opens up to comments or upvotes/downvotes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I mean, is it really any different then upvote and downvote? Why even have that functionality if we should be focusing on requiring everyone to write a reply? :p see how that logic doesn't really make sense?

[โ€“] qprimed@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

well... I think many people use up/down voting as a continued engagement driver (visibility and whatnot). would you also propose filters/sorting for emoji reaction (most hearted, etc)? my biases tend toward simplicity and reactions outside of actual replies "just don't do it for me".

[โ€“] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fair enough, I think it would give the option to more accurately express a reaction over just "I like/don't like this" which I know isn't really what the upvote/downvote system is supposed to be used as but uh... It is what ends up happing lol

[โ€“] radix@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I didn't see the point of what you were saying until you mentioned it would be a way to express disagreement without calling the post itself bad and/or limiting its reach.

(I notice that's what's happening in this post: people don't like the idea, so they downvote, which I think is uncalled for because it means we can't distinguish low-effort spam and trolling from valid but unpopular ideas like yours.)

[โ€“] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[โ€“] qprimed@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

it means we can't distinguish low-effort spam and trolling from valid but unpopular ideas like yours.

Bingo

valid.

edit to say that anything to get up/down votes back to meaning "this is relevant / interesting, (even if I don't agree or like)" would be useful.