this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
199 points (86.4% liked)

Asklemmy

44162 readers
1615 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Communist@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes, they have a tiny, insignificant amount.

An entire country has to have workplace democracy for the country to be socialist.

This is kinda like saying "doesn't any country with a slice of bread have food"

[โ€“] trailing9@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What would change if every company would be democratic?

[โ€“] Moonguide@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

To begin with, there wouldn't be an unspoken agreement between companies to keep wages as low as they can be because more than half of the companies in that market agree that the best they can do is starvation wages.

[โ€“] Communist@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

Y'know how totalitarian regimes are incentivized to be shitholes because of the keys to power problem?

https://invidious.asir.dev/watch?v=rStL7niR7gs

at the very least, that goes away. But there's many more other things.

autistic people could actually get hired

[โ€“] daddyjones@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You think a co-op only has a tiny amount of democracy? I think it's the best form of workers owning the means of production - the definition of socialism.

[โ€“] joejoefashosho@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

I believe they meant that worker cooperatives are a small, almost insignificant part of the overall economy in every country that has them. Often co-ops end up serving a small niche market because they really can't compete with the anti-competitive nature of capitalist big business.

[โ€“] Communist@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's not what I said, my point is that co-ops make up a tiny fraction of a percentage of the economy. If they made up all of it, that would be socialism.

[โ€“] daddyjones@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Ah - I misunderstood. My mistake.