Technology

59414 readers

3080 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

240

How Google Alters Search Queries to Get at Your Wallet (www.wired.com)

submitted 1 year ago by psychothumbs@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

34 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 70 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I've said (and read) it before: the concept of a great search engine is exactly at odds with advertising. A good search engine gives accurate results fast, while the purpose of advertising is to show users what advertisers pay to show them. In other words, it's the difference between showing users what they want to see, versus showing users what advertisers want them to see.

Google knows that the more irrelevant results it returns, the longer you spend looking, which translates into more opportunities to show ads.

[–] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I've just done the same search as in the article on Chrome, Firefox and DuckDuckGo

Google served 5 ads before showing me M&S' website

DDG showed me an ad for Temu then M&S' website

Firefox showed me no ad, thanks ublock, and straight to M&S' website

[–] tb_@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Firefox isn't a search engine, though?

[–] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good point

[–] Very_Bad_Janet@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What search engine were you using on FF?

[–] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Google but with ublock and ghostery

[–] MyPornAlt@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

UblockOrigin recommends against using ghostery.

[–] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I like ghostery's handling of cookie banners though...

Edit. Oh, the easy list thing does that anyway. Thanks

Edit 2. Ghostery is better at cookie popups

[–] GeekyNerdyNerd@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago

Google knows that the more irrelevant results it returns, the longer you spend looking, which translates into more opportunities to show ads.

Which is ironic, as Google only managed to get as far as they did by doing the exact opposite in an era where Alta Vista and the small handful of other OG search engines were focused on maximizing revenue via ads.

Google has become that which they sought to destroy.

[–] Gyrolemmy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If its free you are the product.

[–] MyPornAlt@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 1 year ago

And if you pay for it, you’re still the product…. Because it’s 2023 and fuck the consumers.