this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2022
7 points (100.0% liked)

Science

13006 readers
29 users here now

Studies, research findings, and interesting tidbits from the ever-expanding scientific world.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
Gaywallet@beehaw.org
remington@beehaw.org
7
Some of the most drastic risks from climate change systematically excluded from economic models, researchers say (www.nature.com)
submitted 2 years ago by ailiphilia@feddit.it to c/science@beehaw.org
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

"The interplay within and between different physical and social systems ... are often only poorly understood. This leads to large and growing uncertainty estimates and a wide range of incompletely understood and underestimated risks. For example, the potential for climate change impacts to drive social discontent, dislocation and relocation, and instability and conflict, are all deeply uncertain, but potentially crippling."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hfkldjbuq@beehaw.org 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Thus, the entire property insurance world have had economists working every angle for decades now. Do you know the saying: “The casino always wins”? From what I’ve seen/heard inside the insurance agencies, they are going to make a fortune from the devastation caused by the effects of climate change.

Fucking insurance industry scam. I would love to see it banned. Anyway, that is why sometimes I think not a "democracy" but only something like China would be able to enforce such a change (I know they won't really do that because economy/capitalism...). US the worst of all this; the heart of capitalism.

[–] vord@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Insurance, especially for rare stuff like 'Your home burned down" is a useful thing. It's kinda exploititive if multi-million dollar beach rental homes get to cash out frequently while rates for everyone else skyrocket though.

It's hard to draw a clear line, but I feel like at a certain point beachfront properties will need to kinda be phased out. Would be kinda nice for beaches to be less like amusement parks and more like national parks.

All insurance companies should be member cooperatives or nonprofits, if not just a direct government function.

[–] Helix@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

only something like China would be able to enforce such a change

Why China?

[–] hfkldjbuq@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

things like this https://www.msn.com/en-xl/money/other/china-e2-80-99s-xi-jinping-sends-e2-80-98warning-signal-e2-80-99-to-the-wealthy-as-he-opens-new-front-in-e2-80-98common-prosperity-e2-80-99-push/ar-AA139N4Z

they have the means and are not afraid to take the capitalists down. they have take down exploitative industries already, like the private lectures industry, crypto, jailed for many years some capitalists, and so on... but of course they will not do that to an extent to destroy their own economy; that would not help them to achieve 1st place superpower taking US position.