this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2023
229 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37717 readers
433 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Apple wants to claim depictions of actual apples.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

By this logic, if there’s a law somewhere that unintentionally allows them to crush orphans, they aren’t malicious to do so.

That's not logic, that's a logical fallacy:

False equivalence

A false equivalence or false equivalency is an informal fallacy in which an equivalence is drawn between two subjects based on flawed or false reasoning. This fallacy is categorized as a fallacy of inconsistency. Colloquially, a false equivalence is often called "comparing apples and oranges."

or in this case, comparing a copyright claim to mass child murder... also...

Apple and other corporations lobby for this kind of crappy IP law, so they can sue people.

prove that Apple lobbied the Swiss government for this law or for a favorable outcome. I'm pretty confident that you can't, and that you're making up this claim because you can't make an argument without fabricating claims

Apple expanded into this market recently...

Apple products have been available for purchase in Switzerland for decades.

...and are pretending to be the incumbent apple themed brand in that space in the whole world.

i don't think you know what the word "incumbent" means, but you not liking apple or the fact that they're prolific or popular is not tantamount to a crime. it's pretty entitled to claim that your personal opinion should have any bearing on the legality of another person's or company's actions.

[–] bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Apple lobbies for laws that benefit them all the time. Note that this is a general statement, and not about their activity in Switzerland, just like my previous statement.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/11/20/apple-uighur/

https://readsludge.com/2023/01/23/apple-spent-record-amount-on-lobbying-as-it-fought-antitrust-legislation/

https://mobilesyrup.com/2022/03/16/apple-google-lobby-group-backs-weak-us-privacy-laws/

https://lobbycanada.gc.ca/app/secure/ocl/lrs/do/clntSmmry?clientOrgCorpNumber=363634&sMdKy=1627941425600

Apple watches have not been available for decades.

I'm trying to convey that Apple is an exploitative company. If this offends you, that's weird, is your laptop the lynchpin in your personality?

I'm sorry for triggering you I'll try to be more sensitive of your needs.

[–] Steeve@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

I'm sorry for triggering you I'll try to be more sensitive of your needs.

Dude fuck off with that shit. Have an intelligent conversation or get the hell out of here.

[–] BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Except none of that is in Switzerland. Thanks for proving that you don’t know what you’re talking about and are making things up as justification for your hurt feelings.

[–] bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I guess I am making things up, I thought this was a watchmaker.