this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2022
12 points (100.0% liked)
Asklemmy
43898 readers
1078 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
One of the big economic arguments for the conservation species is bio-prospecting. When a species goes extinct, we lose the opportunity of learning about the potential biochemical and biomechanical tricks that the species might have. Conversely, if we are able to bring a species back from extinction we re-gain this potential. A large mammal like a mammoth has a good probability of teaching us some very valuable biology.
From the point of view of ethics, I consider it less unethical than breeding pugs to be sold as pets, which is a practice that the majority of humans are ok with. This is not to say that it would be ethical in an absolute sense, but I think that not much gets done if society adheres to strict moral absolutes.
If I get to chose, then yes, let's bring them back. I think that it is worth it.