this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
235 points (98.8% liked)

Open Source

31243 readers
284 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Is Hashicorp trying to follow Unity's footsteps? I'm just hoping they won't retroactively change their licenses.

[–] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago

Unity was never open source, right? Different situation.

[–] maniel@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

More like mongodb or elasticsearch

[–] synae@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago

Not nearly as extreme. I can understand the comparison but it's not even close to the egregiousness (that's a word, right?) of unity

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They can't retroactively change the license, doubly so if it's an open-source license, as that would break the contractual agreement made with existing users when they accepted the license terms.

And if the previous license used allows for redistribution, then the existing users are still allowed to redistribute the software under the previous terms, which makes the previous license still valid for new users since they don't have to acquire the software from the original source and are bound to the license it originally came with.

It's a legal can of worms you don't want to open.