this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
372 points (98.9% liked)
Work Reform
10012 readers
462 users here now
A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.
Our Philosophies:
- All workers must be paid a living wage for their labor.
- Income inequality is the main cause of lower living standards.
- Workers must join together and fight back for what is rightfully theirs.
- We must not be divided and conquered. Workers gain the most when they focus on unifying issues.
Our Goals
- Higher wages for underpaid workers.
- Better worker representation, including but not limited to unions.
- Better and fewer working hours.
- Stimulating a massive wave of worker organizing in the United States and beyond.
- Organizing and supporting political causes and campaigns that put workers first.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It is against the law in the US for a company to refuse collective bargaining with a union. NLRB will be involved.
It is but Google doesn't directly employ these workers. They're subcontracted through another firm. Don't get me wrong I hope they get everything they're demanding, but I'm not sure Google has any legal obligation, or even the ability to make changes to their contract.
Almost certainly misclassified employees which is also illegal. But sadly something that is largely just... permitted and ignored.
The employees are not contractors, but it looks like they work for a firm which has been hired by Google. Reading a little further it does look like NLRB has found that Google is considered a joint employer and would be obligated to bargain. Which they're not doing, I guess hoping for an appeal to go their way.
If Google wanted to, they could update their contract, don't give them that easy out