this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2023
105 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22057 readers
150 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RotaryKeyboard@lemmy.ninja 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, you can just feed AI a prompt and take the image that comes out, but that's not how people do things anymore. AI art generation is now a complex set of image generation, in-/outpainting, tweaking, etc. I spent a couple of hours last night updating myself on how it is done, and I was shocked at all the changes that have taken place in the last six months. Now people are even passing their art through AI model subsets that they have trained themselves in order to get specific results, like specific backgrounds, vehicles, buildings... it's incredible.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think we're going to agree on this, but that's okay :)

On one hand, I will agree, properly utilized, that it's more like to a tool to be wielded than a "do it for me bot"; part of a larger process with the artist behind the wheel. On the other hand, though, I consider it the autotune of the visual medium (I'm not a fan of autotune in music, so at least I'm consistent?).

I'm definitely not saying "AI art isn't art", but I am saying that I am not a personal fan of it. It just ruins the magic for me.

[–] RotaryKeyboard@lemmy.ninja 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Actually, "autotune of art" is about the best description of AI Art I've heard in a long time.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 2 points 1 year ago

Call me old school, but I want to see where the artist made a happy little accident.