this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
259 points (98.5% liked)

Asklemmy

43885 readers
1017 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] DokPsy@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm glad you understand my point. Chatgpt is not Google. It's a language model that will give you something that looks like the thing you asked for it to provide. It can and will pull facts out of its recycle bin if it fits the cadence of what it expects the answer to look like.

[โ€“] XEAL@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

ChatGPT is not Google, but sometimes it can work as a glorified search engine or even compete with asking in forums.

I've lost count of how many times ChatGPT has produced Bash or Python code for what I needed. Yes, sometimes the code is wrong and/or requires tweaking and sometimes I resorted to look into the documentation, but no one will answer faster and anytime of the day like ChatGPT does, at least not for free.

[โ€“] DokPsy@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's a tool to aid in creating a product, not a tool that magics out a finished product. That's my point. Too many people use it as the latter instead of the former.

[โ€“] XEAL@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

100% agree.

Maybe, with lots of training, weaking and testing the latter could be achieved, but that's it.