this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2023
100 points (94.6% liked)

Programming

17319 readers
69 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Let's be honest, the majority here probably has a github account. Some of us are happy as a clam and wouldn't switch no matter what happened, but there are some who would and haven't yet. Why?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] theKalash@feddit.ch 80 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Elon Musk buying it.

Seriously though, it would take something rather drastic. Our company briefly tried using bitbucket, but it was just worse overall. Don't touch a running system.

[–] lysdexic@programming.dev 51 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Elon Musk buying it.

Holy hell, you went for the jugular.

[–] theKalash@feddit.ch 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The guy owning the Xhub.com domain is rubbing his hands right now.

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 year ago

He'll rename branches tubes and merge conflicts X, and with that he'll come up with the new name: xtube

[–] mrkite@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

He shouldn't be. Elon doesn't give massive payouts. If he really wanted that domain, he'd trademark it and sue the owner for it.

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What's the problem with bitbucket? It's a solid... oh shit sorry atlassian is down. One moment.

[–] abhibeckert@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I haven't had reliability issues with BitBucket. My main complaint is it's just really difficult to use.

I just find my time in GitHub is smoother and easier. For example comparing branches/tags to each other... in GitHub if you open a release from a week ago, there will be a link "this is 12 commits behind your main branch" and you can just click it to view the code in those commits.

BitBucket doesn't even have releases. They just have tags which can trigger pipelines. Functionality wise, it's the same thing. But from an ease of use perspective GitHub is so much faster and easier to navigate as long as your project follows standard branching/tagging/etc practices (which it should, especially if you're working on a team).

[–] Fluffysquash@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They don’t even have syntax highlighting on pull requests. Like the fuck

[–] JRaccoon@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

They recently added it as a experimental feature and it has been working fairly well, at least for Java. As far as I recall, each user needs to activate it themselves via settings. Far from optimal but better than nothing.

[–] tun@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

My one-man software development company is using bitbucket along with a local mirror (with Gitea).

[–] Sigmatics@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

People also said that when Microsoft bought them. In the end it didn't really make a dent in their user numbers