this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
135 points (94.7% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5244 readers
339 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7
135
Opinion: clueless voters risk returning Donald Trump to the White House (www.energymonitor.ai)
submitted 1 year ago by silence7 to c/climate
30 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Any chance of limiting global warming to 1.5˚C rests on Joe Biden being elected to a second term. Voters need an accurate accounting of Biden’s climate record ahead of the November 2024 election.

If you're in the US and want to get involved, you can volunteer or give to the Biden Victory Fund

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I worry that the only way to escape this nonsense two party system is for one party to lose enough that people start waking the fuck up that there are other, better options. Maybe if Trump / Desantis is electric then we'll stop boiling frogs and get legitimately good candidates in.

[–] silence7 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The two-party system exists in the US because of how elections are run. In particular, most states decide who wins an election by who gets the most votes in the general election. So when you have a third party in the mix, it serves as a spoiler, tipping the election to the people that it disagrees with the most. A few examples:

Example 1: D: 10 R: 9 I: 0

The Democrat wins

Example 2: D: 9 R: 9 I: 1

Tied election, with outcome decided by a coin flip or other game of chance

Example 3: D: 8 R: 9 I: 2

The Republican wins

The model which lets you change outcomes when elections are run like this is to take over a party from the inside. That means running candidates in the primaries in safe districts, and then backing them with money and volunteer hours.