this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2023
814 points (97.1% liked)

News

23266 readers
4092 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Saturday’s temperature had triggered an excessive heat warning across Arizona as lows were expected to range between 80F and 86F

On Saturday afternoon, the National Weather Service announced that the temperature at Phoenix Sky Harbor international airport reached 110F, making it the 54th day this year with temperatures of at least 110F.

Saturday’s temperature breaks the previous record of 53 days that was set in 2020. From 1991 to 2020, the average consecutive days of 110F or above is 21 days, the NWS said.

An excessive heat warning has been issued for south central and south-west Arizona until 8pm on Sunday as weekend highs are expected to range between 108F and 114F. Meanwhile, lows are expected to range between 80F to 86F.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (13 children)

Metric: 1 calorie heats 1 gram of water 1 C°, 1 gram is equal to 1cm³. Water boils at 100 C° and freezes at zero.

Imperial: 1 calorie heats 1 something by ?? F equal to ???, and 0F and 100F are completely irrelevant to everyday life and tasks.

[–] wavebeam@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I get your point, but disagree with your thesis. Fahrenheit makes a lot of sense for human comfort ranges. 0 and 100 are some of the most extreme natural temperatures most people in F-using countries ever see. 0 means cold as fuck and 100 means hot as fuck. And there’s a single-digit useful precision to it as well. 72 and 73 are close, but noticeably different. Celsius requires decimals for that kind of difference. And 0 means “it’s kinda cold outside, I guess” and 100 means “you were dead a long time ago”, so it’s not nearly as useful in every day life with natural living temperatures.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

So you're saying it's relevant for basically nothing but the weather. It's not a very good argument.

[–] rambaroo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

To be fair, that's all it's used for. No one uses Fahrenheit for science in the US.

[–] seejur@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is also incredibly subjective. What's comfortable for one person might not be for another. I'm pretty sure an Inuit and a Ghanan have pretty different ideas of what's cold or hot. Same for Floridan and Minnesotan speaking of the US

[–] rambaroo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

0 and 100 are not comfortable for anyone.

[–] Saltblue@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I get your point "but because I was brought up with this system I'm going to make an argument as why it makes sense to me"

25 Celsius is a nice summer day 0 Celsius you better take a jacket and it's probably going to snow 43 Celsius damn hot 60-80 Celsius a very nice sauna

It's not that hard burgerman

[–] Hylactor@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

burgerman

Hey, we didn't come up with the shit in the first place. The Imperial System is a British invention.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago (5 children)

If it requires this much explanation, it's not very sensible.

In Celsius 0 is freezing and 100 is boiling. It's so simple. "Comfortable" is anywhere from like 15-30 (my Canadian standards, very subjective I know) and we don't need decimals.

[–] squirrelwithnut@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] Nath@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Fairly cold"? I've been in 0c a few times in my life and every time it was freezing!

Isn't 100f the temperature your blood is meant to be?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] foksmash@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's honestly really intuitive for weather if you grew up with it. We still use metric for science because it makes the most sense there, like you say.

[–] PBSkidz4Lyfe@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

But it's not that simple. 100 boiling is only true at sea level. At 530 (~1750 feet) it's 98c. At 1500m (~5000ft) it's down to 95c. At 3000m (10k feet) it's just under 90c. Ocean water freezes at -2c. Fully saturated salt water freezes at -21c.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Any usefulness of Fahrenheit is purely accidental, how is water freezing at 32F useful? I'll grant that the finer resolution can be seen as a positive, I don't see how Fahrenheit is better for human comfort, my personal optimal comfort zone is 22-24C°, and I have no need for decimals for that. 73F is pretty close to 23C, I don't see much difference regarding comfort in either.

The huge problem with Fahrenheit, is that it is impractical in many situations, it has basically no merit to justify its existence, and only a minority of countries continue to use it.

Of course Americans can do whatever they want, but they are looking stupider for each year they keep using "Freedom Units".

Of course Americans switch to metric for mostly anything scientific, for example NASA use Metric.

[–] FlowVoid@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The SI unit of temperature is kelvin, not Celsius.

If people don't want to use kelvin, does that mean they are stupid?

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

True, but Kelvin is based on Celsius, only difference is that zero is moved from freezing water to absolute zero. Celsius however is more practical for everyday life.

[–] FlowVoid@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Celsius is only practical if you measure the temperature of water more often than the temperature of air.

But most people never measure the temperature of water, and frequently measure the temperature of air. For them, Celsius offers no advantage.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why? As I see it, it's quite practical for air too, epecially when considering humidity.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wavebeam@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The usefulness of gravity is also purely accidental

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

0 means any water outside will most likely start freezing, 100 means any water outside will be boiling. Makes sense to me. What temp do things start freezing in F? 30? 40? Doesn't make sense at all. What temp does water boil? 160? I dunno, none of it is rational in any way.

[–] azulavoir@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

0/32/64/96 are somewhat reasonable breakpoints in F, and make dividing the space between them in half repeatedly on a thermometer simple. Fahrenheit was literally made up by Big Thermometer for this exact reason.

Lol, big thermometer.

[–] myusernameblows@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

"Somewhat reasonable"

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago

Salt water freezes at 0F. Normal water at 32 F. Normal water boils at 212 F. Human body at 100 F (which is wrong, but also has been changing.) Below 10 F snot in nose freezes. 20 F is time to switch to long pants.

[–] joel_feila@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

they are all arbitrary numbers. Originally C actually had water freeze at 0 and boil at -100

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Water freezes at an obvious 32°F at sea level and of course boils at 212°F. What's so confusing about that? /s

[–] FlowVoid@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago

Water boils at 99.9839 Celsius, not 100. What so confusing about that?

[–] coaxil@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] joel_feila@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

but how often does knowing how to convert water weight to volume come up? Same with the energy to heat water.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Weight to volume is extremely common when I cook, because often things are measured in volume, but I prefer to use the weight.

½ a liter water or milk or almost any fluid without extra dish-washing? Easy you just put it on the weight, select tara, and pour 500 grams. Voila you just saved both kitchen space and extra work. because 1g = 1ml with water and most fluids.

It's equally easy if the number given isn't in liter, ml or milliliter of course converts directly to grams, and dl or deciliter = 100 g. 1 liter of course being 1000 ml and in water 1000 g or 1 kg. It's consistent all the way through.

I guess if you are used to Freedom units, this may sound like science fiction, but this has been reality in many countries for a long time already.

[–] FlowVoid@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

One pint of water or milk without extra dish-washing? Easy you just put it on the scale and pour one pound.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

OK Imperial is not something I'm used to use, but according to Wikipedia, a pint is 569.6 ml and a pound is 0.4535 kg.

So you'd be off by 116,1 g or a whopping 25%!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperial_units

That would ruin many great recipes.

[–] FlowVoid@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The American pint is 473 mL.

The Imperial pint used to be that much too, hence the old saying "A pint is a pound the world around". Then the Imperial pint was increased by 25%, but Americans kept the old amount.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How should I know which you use, AFAIK freedom units are American.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] joel_feila@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That would make more dishes. If i need flour water and milk i just use the same cup. And i have scale to wash off.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Nath@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The water/weight comes up all the time. Filling a 10L bucket, I know that is going to weigh 10kg. I know I can lift it and my kid can't.

The energy one, I'm not even sure is right. We don't use calories, we use kilojoules. A joule is used to lift 1kg 1m. It's not something I ever use. I use kilojoules for tracking food I ate today, that's about it.

[–] joel_feila@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah i dont really use energy unless i want explain kwh to gallons of gasoline.

But fir water buckets i just see the bycket and have enough experience to know if i can

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BackOnMyBS@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm a fan of the metric system, but understand that Fahrenheit is pretty convenient for regular human temperatures. For one, the vast majority of climate temperatures that we experience in the US on a regular basis land between 0°F & 100°F except for deserts & recent climate change impacts. For another, Farenheit is a bit more precise as whole numbers since differences between degrees are smaller, so I can be more precise with my a/c thermostat.

Still, I would prefer that we change to metric across the board in the US because it is more congruent across dimensions and decimals are easier to manipulate than fractions for me. For the latter, if I had a recipe that required I calculate 1/3 cup plus 1/2 cup, I have to switch to 2/6 & 3/6, which equals 5/6, then I'm stuck estimating that anyway since most measuring cups aren't labeled to the 6th precision. It gets even more confusing when we have to consider teaspoons, tablespoons, & pints. Using liters would be so much more convenient for me. Another area where I get confused is when measurements for food are presented as ounces versus fluid ounces. I understand the difference, but it's still something I have to think extra about.

My one request in switching over to metric would be that weather and thermostat temperatures are presented at least to the .5°C precision level so that 75°F would be 24.0°C and 74°F would be 23.5°C. Yes, I'm this picky about my thermostat settings and can notice a difference between 75°F/24.0°C and 74°F/23.5°C.

[–] RunawayFixer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Request granted! My European thermostat that is about 30 years old now, has a display accuracy of 0.5 degrees, so I'd expect more modern systems to be at least as accurate. I'm not going to speak of the actual accuracy, but the display at least is 0.5 🙂

load more comments (9 replies)