Asklemmy

43746 readers

1253 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[SOLVED] Why do stories have such effect on us? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Subject6051@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

26 comments fedilink hide all child comments

All religions have it's own myths, own stories, own set of values. And these are/were good stories, I mean, even though they are not true, they are certainly interesting. You won't feel bored by it.

Harry Potter has the same effect on people, like, why should I take Harry Potter seriously, why do I care what happens after Dumbledore dances with Snape (won't give actual spoilers :')

I mean, it doesn't make sense to me. Why do I care so much about a soap opera that I am watching. Harry Potter is the product of just one brilliant woman's imagination. It has no real value on my life. I have no real motivation to read that other than the fact that I like it and I want to know. Harry Potter is somewhat irrelevant to my life, than why does it or any other good story capture our imagination?

Why do I care what the next season of House M.D. entails? Why? What should I care if he dies or lives? Why :')?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm not a sociologist, but it's worth noting that for many thousands of years, humans passed on knowledge by story telling. If you had zero interest in listening to elders telling stories, you were less likely to learn important stuff, and so less likely to survive. It seems likely that we're naturally selected to be interested in stories.

But, in the same way that craving sweets used to drive people to eat fruit, but now that same urge drives us to eat candy, our inclination to listen to stories gets people to watch soap operas or marvel movies, which isn't exactly improving our chance of survival.

[–] Subject6051@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

thank you! that makes sense

[–] redballooon@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

No it doesn’t. Evolution is an explanation for species to adjust to the environment . This comment says “the environment was stories”. But how our ancestors developed the habit of story telling in the first place is still unexplained with this little piece of fiction.

[–] redballooon@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But that doesn’t explain why stories were the form to convey information in the first place.

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

It sort of does. Groups who told stories and listened to stories survived better than other groups. It doesn't matter that there might have been another way to pass on information, that one worked and helped the group thrive. Lots of different animals solve the same issue in different ways - evolution doesn't care.