this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
357 points (96.9% liked)

Asklemmy

43855 readers
1818 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For me it is the fact that our blood contains iron. I earlier used to believe the word stood for some 'organic element' since I couldn't accept we had metal flowing through our supposed carbon-based bodies, till I realized that is where the taste and smell of blood comes from.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] rtxn@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (4 children)

We can't touch objects, ever. Most of the space "occupied" by an atom is emptiness (which is another rabbit hole I'm not willing to go down), and when we "touch" an object, it's just a force field pushing the atoms apart. It's the same reason why we don't fall apart into atoms - some invisible force just really wants our atoms to stay together.

[โ€“] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's just semantics. For any real definition of "touch", we do touch objects.

"to put the hand, finger, etc., on or into contact with (something) to feel it"

The electromagnetic fields of your hand come in contact with those of the object, and you feel it.

[โ€“] blackbrook@mander.xyz 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's taking semantics from one frame of reference and trying to apply them in the frame of reference of an entirely different scale, realizing that it doesn't work the same way, and then claiming that it is therefore "wrong".

[โ€“] SnipingNinja 1 points 1 year ago

The only thing I took away from this (when I learnt it years ago) is that telekinesis is possible and we do it daily, we just need to improve its range.

[โ€“] morphballganon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So how does cutting an apple in half work? The knife must be touching the apple to cut it, right?

[โ€“] menturi@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can kind of visualize it as wire EDM manufacturing. Although not a fully accurate depiction, but it fractures the connection between the two sides.

[โ€“] Eranziel@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

That analogy relies on the reader having any idea what wire EDM manufacturing is. ;) Not exactly an everyday topic.

[โ€“] rahmad@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The apple was never whole.... it was simply tightly grouped and a subgroup has been severed from another

[โ€“] legion02@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

And it was severed by a thin slice of atoms that used their force field as a wedge to force them apart.

[โ€“] EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

"So what I'm trying to say, your honor, is that no, I did not inappropriately touch this child"

[โ€“] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]