this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
162 points (95.5% liked)

News

23305 readers
4083 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] throw4w4y5@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

remember he only needs to delay until the election. if he’s elected president again then all the consequences go out the window.

[–] qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (4 children)

That's only true if he can pardon himself for the election interference. That's not going to happen unless they move the case to federal court.

[–] Icalasari@kbin.social 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not if he goes the Hitler route and consolidates power. Which honestly, I think he and the GoP are planning to do

Will it work is another discussion, but I'm sure this is what he plans to do

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lots of the "brown shirts" have already been convicted and are sentenced after their actions on Jan 6th.

[–] Cleverdawny@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago

That happened in the Weimar Republic, too. Hitler wrote Mein Kampf in prison, and plenty of people got arrested for things like the Beer Hall Putsch. Stay vigilant and organized, politically cooperate with anyone who opposes the Republicans, don't take it for granted that the courts will handle this neo fascist ideology for us, you know?

[–] Heresy_generator@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He can't pardon it no matter what court it's in; they're still state charges.

[–] jdsquared@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'll explain this I think 45 times in 3 weeks. I wish more people would read.

[–] jdsquared@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Edit. That should be past tense lol. Not editing it for prosperity.

[–] Nougat@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is true, but what I have not seen discussed is that the Georgia Pardon and Parole board can consider a request to commute the sentence immediately, and can choose to reduce or eliminate any sentence handed down.

[–] Acronymesis@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

the Georgia Pardon and Parole board can consider a request to commute the sentence immediately, and can choose to reduce or eliminate any sentence handed down.

Thanks, (this is good information to know, but) I hate it.

[–] SoylentBlake@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hmm. I was under the impression that the governor couldn't even pardon someone in GA unless they had served out 5 years of a sentence, thus guaranteeing jail time.

[–] Nougat@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're right. A pardon in Georgia cannot even be requested from the Pardon and Parole Board until five years after any sentence is served. Commutation of a sentence is a different thing altogether.

Pardon is "You don't receive any punishment for this crime." Commutation is "After consideration, the sentence you received is being reduced." And in commutation, the sentence can be reduced to zero.

The Georgia Pardon and Parole Board can consider a request for commutation immediately after sentencing, and can commute a sentence immediately, again, that's reducing a sentence, including a 100% reduction.

[–] SoylentBlake@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Ty for clarifying that for me :)

[–] Endorkend@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pardoning himself from doing time, doesn't exclude other provisions against a convicted criminal holding office.

A pardon explicitly states you're guilty of the crime you're pardoned for.

[–] negativenull@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Endorkend@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Might want to read what you link.

[–] MoreThanCorrect@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

How do you interpret the linked article? To me it read as an essay that argued that pardons neither firmly convey guilt nor innocence because there exists mixed precedence and reasoning for both.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s only true if he can pardon himself for the election interference. That’s not going to happen unless they move the case to federal court.

That wouldn't work either. The first step in a pardon is that the person convicted has to admit guilt to trying to steal the election. If he straight up admits guilt that's clearly a Fourteenth Amendment violation.

[–] ShruberyPanda@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

This is a common misconception. While a pardon does mean some things (like removing your ability to plead the 5th in relation to the related case), it remains very disputed whether it constitutes an admission of guilt:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burdick_v._United_States#:~:text=Although%20the%20Supreme%20Court's%20opinion,by%20the%20recipient%20is%20disputed.