this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
1684 points (97.2% liked)

politics

19120 readers
3921 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

What an utter piece of shit.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's why he's a billionaire: no sense of ethics or morality. Dude has outgrown the moral demands of the invisible hand since he's its undeniable winner. So, like...why should he not interfere in war?

[–] Hegar@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I would reverse it: That's why he has no morals, he's a billionaire. Having social or financial power reduces the brain's capacity for empathy - the rich and powerful become evil.

Biologically, that's how power works. You can't grow up with money (esp. South African diamond money) without being evil.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

I think it was emerald mining, FYI.

[–] hellweaver666@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It’s absolutely impossible to become a billionaire and have anything resembling a conscience. Some folks get rich and then have an “oh shit” moment (like Bill Gates) but most just continue abusing every mechanism they can to get richer.

[–] BioDriver@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gates cheated on his wife and was a total asshole through this tenure with Microsoft. Dolly Parton, meanwhile, would be a billionaire if she’d just stop donating all her money and time to charities, underprivileged groups, and other noble causes.

[–] Cabrio@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Whataboutism is a soviet disinformation strategy.

[–] mjhelto@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

How, exactly, was that "whataboutism?" The comment was made about Bill Gates, implying he was some sort of "changed man," when in actuality, he's not. Fun fact, he's the reason the coronavirus vaccine was not released for free/cheap to less developed countries. He "Gates-keeped" (see what I did there?) a whole fucking vaccine, that could have saved thousands to millions of lives worldwide, in the name of profit and investment.

The only reason he changed anything about his wealth hoarding was because of his, now, ex wife. She was his empathy. Now that they are divorced, he's back to his old shitty habits. Another little bit of info, he's been buying up farmland cause he knows that climate change will lead to drought and famine and he wants to take in those fat digital zeros when he's one of the few food producers for the country.

So sure, "whataboutism is bad or Russian or whatever," but that was a direct counter to the notion that Bill Gates has become a fucking Messiah; a changed man. The best thing about Bill Gates divorced him.

[–] Cabrio@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Straight up watabouted Bill with Dolly on their philanthropy while completely dismissing that Bill has invested more than Dolly's total net worth ($350 million) year over year by a factor of 23 ($8.3 billion in 2023 alone).

[–] BioDriver@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Bill was only philanthropic because of his now-ex wife, who he still cheated on. He never became a “better person,” he was always a shitbag. Dolly, meanwhile, was never a shitbag and constantly gave to charity throughout her career and stood up for what was right throughout her life, including being pro-LGBTQ+ in the fucking 70s.

This isn’t whataboutism, this is contrasting two wildly different people.

[–] Cabrio@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

Nobody in the is entire thread said he wasn't a piece of shit. You do realise that right? Doesn't change that he's done 8 wannabe billionaires worth of Dolly Partons in philanthropic investments just this year alone.