this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
337 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37717 readers
454 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

...and the related Mozilla report

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jherazob@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No idea, but for starters say goodbye to navigation, it likely uses an internet connection

[–] PeutMieuxFaire@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

For recent cars I am afraid you are right. My current and "old" car has a built in navigation system with the map on an SD-card. No need for a connection to a smartphone - which I do not own. Therefore I suppose it is not communicating with the manufacturer.

Then, someone in my family with a more recent car got several "firmware updates" out of the blue, hinting to a 'permanent' connection to the manufacturer.

I have the feeling we need to start organizing and claim a "right to disconnection". Having the car dial for help after a crash is one thing but what Mozilla's report describes is at another, much higher level.

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 year ago

Built-in nav is trash, anyway. I’ve always used my phone.