this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2023
868 points (96.2% liked)

Showerthoughts

29578 readers
1032 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The best ones are thoughts that many people can relate to and they find something funny or interesting in regular stuff.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Art by smbc-comics

Consciousness is often said to disappear in deep, dreamless sleep. We argue that this assumption is oversimplified. Unless dreamless sleep is defined as unconscious from the outset there are good empirical and theoretical reasons for saying that a range of different types of sleep experience, some of which are distinct from dreaming, can occur in all stages of sleep.

Pubmed Articles

Does Consciousness Disappear in Dreamless Sleep?

Sciencealert Article We Were Wrong About Consciousness Disappearing in Dreamless Sleep, Say Scientists

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kevinbacon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Thats exactly what some do, depends on the anesthetic, but it doesn't matter because if a memory never forms it may as well not have happened.

[–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

if a memory never forms it may as well not have happened

That is an interesting philosophical question.

If suffering is not remembered, was there even suffering? And if there was, does it matter? I can think of a few counterexamples of that, for example: a killer who tortures his victim before killing them.

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Uhh, yes and yes? What's stopping a rapist from anesthesizing their victims before the act and using the fact that they did as an excuse to get off charges under your logic?

[–] jarfil@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Physical abuse tends to leave some physical consequences. You'd have to come up with an example where there would be neither physical not psychological consequences... but even getting anesthesized against one's will is already a consequence.

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No it doesn't, not always. Actually it's routine for medical students to be brought in to give anesthesitized women pelvic exams without their knowledge and consent, and no one was the wiser until universities that did this announced it... https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/17/health/pelvic-medical-exam-unconscious.html

That is textbook rape right there, and it doesn't often have physical consequences. Most women didn't even know but doctors fucking did it anyway.

How you people have any faith in any aspect of society is beyond me.

EDIT: And now I'm being downvoted over it. Imagine being downvoted for pointing out rape occurs during surgical procedures, a well-established fact. Think about the implications of that

[–] jarfil@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

That article is a mix of several cases.

One of those you might call going against the wishes of the patient... then again, that's quite common in the ER, patients are yet to be established as "sound of mind" and capable of deciding for themselves, so an ER doctor can overrule them, including sedating to perform any procedures they consider necessary.

Others seem like letting students perform a non-vital part of a procedure, which is both expected from University/teaching hospitals, and in my personal experience was spelled out in the consent form (although they never told me personally, so if I hadn't read it, I wouldn't know).

That is textbook rape right there

None of those are. Communication could be improved, and I personally get pissed when medical personnel switches from "medical adult talk" to "patient baby talk" right in front of me... but I've also seen patients get upset because they didn't understand what was being talked about, and had to be calmed down with "baby talk"... so it's a difficult issue overall.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

Presumably in your scenario the victim remembers the torture though.

In the case of general anaesthetic the memory is effectively considered to be deleted in real time. On its way through the brain it ceases to exist so it never reaches the conscious mind.

[–] jarfil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There was a case of a guy, where they botched the anesthesia, and he was just paralyzed but conscious the whole time during some invasive surgery. They realized their mistake, and tried to fix it by giving him some amnesic so he wouldn't retain the memories.

After getting discharged, he wouldn't remember anything... but kept having nightmares, and a few weeks later took his own life.

So it seems like memories don't need to be fully formed to mess one up.

[–] kevinbacon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

That sounds like the mechanism might be different though, but yeah some percentage of people wake up during surgery while the paralytic is still in effect, they closely monitor the heart rate for sudden spikes because of this I believe. It sounds horrifying to me, but then I remember that there was a time when anesthetics didn't exist.