this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2023
29 points (100.0% liked)

Programming

13368 readers
2 users here now

All things programming and coding related. Subcommunity of Technology.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
Hexorg@beehaw.org
remington@beehaw.org
29
Why do we have two modes in cpu(user and kernel) since we still can still easily harm computer with userland programs? (lemm.ee)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by SmoothSurfer@lemm.ee to c/programming@beehaw.org
23 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I have never dug into low level things like cpu architectures etc. and decided to give it a try when I learned about cpu.land.

I already was aware of the existence of user and kernel mode but while I was reading site it came to me that "I still can harm my system with userland programs so what does it mean to switch user mode for almost everything other than kernel and drivers?" also we still can do many things with syscalls, what is that stopping us(assuming we want to harm system of course) from damaging our system.

[edit1]: grammar mistakes

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] farcaster@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, security is in layers and userland isn't automatically "safe", if that's what you're pointing out. So I did mention non-superusers. Separating the kernel from userland applications is also critically important to (try to) prevent non-superusers from accessing APIs and devices which only superusers (or those in particular groups) are able to reach.