Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Please don't post about US Politics.
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
There are people earning 10k/month who are living paycheck to paycheck, so for them 10k saving is just one month
Yes, exactly this
Bruh these people absolutely have the option to scale back, don't feel bad for them. They live paycheck to paycheck after their $80k car payments and $600k house mortgage. That's not the same.
Or maybe they have a family with kids, they live in an expensive part of town, but moving is not an option due to job constraints, or maybe the kids are going to school there and moving would be disruptive. Maybe that area didn't use to be so expensive 10 years ago. They need cars, not 80k cars, but large enough to haul said family around, cause maybe public transportation sucks where they live (ahem*LA*cough). Heck, maybe they bought those cars in cash, no payments, but gas, insurance & maintenance (maybe they're old cars) are killing them. Car prices are too expensive to get a new car, so they keep spending 1000s in repairs instead. Maybe a hurricane, strong winds or just normal wear and tear made their house roof leak, thats $20k right there, ask me how I know.
Also, a 600k house is cheap and almost impossible to find in California, for example. No, moving to Texas is not an option, thanks.
Edit: the example above is hypothetical, not my current situation, but based on my experience.
There is no definition of being wealthy that does not include people that make $120k/year.
You are richer than 80% of the country at that point. Lots of people have families in high COL cities and live on significantly less money than that.
https://www.taxpolicycenter.org/statistics/household-income-quintiles
I literally spent $24k on home repairs this summer, and I just pay it in payments, and I make 6 figures. No normal person pays this in cash, outright.
My roof replacement a few years back was $8k covered by home insurance.
There is no set amount of USD that defines the line between "wealthy" and "poor". Your $120k figure would go a lot further in Mississippi or Texas that it would go in California or Massachusetts, where that would be barely enough for a large family.
There's definitely a place (or two) in the US where a family struggles with $120k/yr. Sure, just move to Mississippi, I guess ...
They would be considered "poor" there, or at least not wealthy.
Well good for you, I guess.
I guess I'm not normal.
Good for you, that would get you half a roof here, and insurance won't cover if it's considered normal wear and tear.
No you are definitely not normal and that is the entire duscussion
Those are all things you can scale back on. People who make less certainly are forced to. Not that they're not entitled to live there, my point is I don't feel bad at all that they're claiming to live paycheck to paycheck, because they have the option to not be.
For some of us, that mortgage is the cheap option. My payment is well under rent for a 2br in my town, plus I have an outstanding interest rate
Check out the crabs in the bucket
It's not bringing people down, it's not having pity for them. Maybe you misread the comment.