Technology

59414 readers

3115 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

582

Yes, a Pigeon is Faster for Data Transfer than Gigabit Fiber Internet (www.tomshardware.com)

submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

103 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Yes, a Pigeon is Faster for Data Transfer than Gigabit Fiber Internet::A decade ago, a pigeon with a 4 GB memory stick outran an ISP’s ADSL service. A 2023 rematch features a bird with 3 TB of flash drives vs gigabit internet.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 39 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yea, and packet size is enormous, so one lost packet is catastrophic...

[–] nxdefiant@startrek.website 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is why you use TCP: Trusted Concurrent Pigeons.

Trusted Pigeons so that a simple hash check can prove the veracity of your data AND provide a free dedupe / data integrity check for when multiple/single packets arrive.

Concurrent Pigeons so that transmission issues don't impact latency (throughput is essentially unlimited here, assuming sufficient pigeons)

Downsides include needing to implement a pigeon cache and power (birdfood) requirement increases.

[–] SnipingNinja 7 points 1 year ago

You forgot about the interference (bird shit) it'll cause with other things throughout the ~~data~~ highway

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago

Telnet sucks bad with Pigeonet