this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
240 points (97.2% liked)

World News

38563 readers
2838 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bouh@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (5 children)

To add onto the capitalist blame: people are conditioned to think in a capitalist way, and raising a child is a definite losing venture, hence people won't invest in that shit.

[–] Gsus4@feddit.nl 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If you can hardly feed and house yourself ... you can't afford to woo a wife or raise a kid :/ but that won't stop some people trying to half-ass it I guess

[–] veganpizza69@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Quite the opposite, capitalists want more human resources, human capital. There's an entire ideology, at least centuries old, about this. You can most easily read about it as: pronatalism.

People aren't conditioned to think in a capitalist way, they're conditioned to think about their kids future not being worse than their present, since having kids can throw you into poverty.

[–] bouh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Some wrong language I guess. You talk capitalists as those who possess stuff, and you're right in this way. I talk about the liberal ideology of capitalism that produces consumer citizens and the glorification of individualism. The people a capitalist society produce.

[–] veganpizza69@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Well, it takes a village to raise a child. The capitalist culture also brings this idea of "nuclear family" which generates this impossible situation for the "nuclear family" to afford kids. Of course, the other aspect of this is the eugenicist/fascist aspect of: only the rich can afford kids, so them it makes sense, this nuclear family. It's not a problem to have a nuclear family if you're rich, and you can just replace the village by paying for extra caretakers... another type of commodified relationship. The rich can afford to pay a woman to babysit for years, while that woman can't afford to have a family or to see her kids (often because her family is in a different country). Family for me, but not for thee.

[–] Persen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tho, you make it once and have it for the rest of your life.

[–] Vrijgezelopkamers@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

The purchase price is negligible, but the total cost of ownership is staggering.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They’re not just brainwashed they are living a capitalist reality where those thoughts are rational observations of the truth around them.

definite losing venture

I get it now. You’re some teenager who doesn’t know that raising kids is literally massively expensive. Gee you must think you’re so bright for coming up with this idea that people are conditioned to think of kids as revenue negative enterprise! I can’t believe the size of the whoosh here.

I don't think I disagree with you, but with this comment you're kinda being an ass

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You uh... don't know what you're talking about.

[–] doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 year ago

Does he not? From a purely selfish financial pov having a kid is a terrible idea.

Sure, most people don't explicitly think in those terms, but financial stability absolutely is a factor many people consider before having kids