this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2023
299 points (99.3% liked)

Damn, that's interesting!

4688 readers
1 users here now

  1. No clickbait
  2. No Racism and Hate speech
  3. No Imgur Gallery Links
  4. No Infographics
  5. Moderator Discretion
  6. Repost Guidelines
  7. No videos over 15 minutes long
  8. No "Photoshopped" posts
  9. Image w/ text posts must be sourced in comments

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] geeraff@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

TBF they also have Hawaii, Alaska, and Guam

[–] ikiru@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At least they're consistent.

But I'd say they should probably all be independent too.

[–] soviettaters@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hawaii maybe (but even then they currently benefit more than they suffer from being a state), but certainly not Alaska. They can't even sustain themselves without help from the federal government.

[–] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago

Hawaii maybe (but even then they currently benefit more than they suffer from being a state)

I doubt the natives think the same.

but certainly not Alaska. They can’t even sustain themselves without help from the federal government.

Probably because its run as an extractive economy.