this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
579 points (90.7% liked)

World News

38583 readers
1637 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Femcowboy@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If we had an energy system owned by the people and not ran for profits, nuclear would be a viable, and probably even the preferred, option. We do not. We're probably going to have to fix that to get a practical and reliable clean energy grid.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, it would just bankrupt the state. Just because something is state owned, doesn't mean the cost vanishes.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Infrastructure in this country is already so heavily subsidized by the federal government (and state, if you live somewhere that actually cares about your well-being) that we're already pretty much paying for it all.

[–] Jagermo@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

What do you do with the waste in that scenario? Who pays for that? Or for insurance?