this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
273 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

60067 readers
4745 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
273
The Protecting Kids on Social Media Act is A Terrible Alternative to KOSA (www.eff.org)
submitted 1 year ago by thenexusofprivacy@lemmy.sdf.org to c/technology@lemmy.world
24 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A new bill sponsored by Sen. Schatz (D-HI), Sen. Cotton (R-AR), Sen. Murphy (D-CT), and Sen. Britt (R-AL) would combine some of the worst elements of various social media bills aimed at “protecting the children” into a single law.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chakan2@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wouldn't call it extremist...it's usually reasonable policy protecting people's privacy. It's only extreme because it would severely cut into big tech's profits and the USs surveillance capacity.

[–] MaxHardwood@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Probably more apt to call them absolutists than extremists.

[–] thenexusofprivacy@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago

Within the privacy community, EFF's viewed as pragmatists -- far from absolutists or extremists. So I agree with @chakan2@chakan2@lemmy.world, it only gets regarded as extreme because big tech and the surveillance-industrial complex have normalized not expecting privacy.