this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
179 points (95.0% liked)

Games

32670 readers
1442 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

TL;DR:

Image showing the release times for Starfield

Image comparing the different editions of Starfield

Minimum Specs:

  • OS: Windows 10 version 21H1 (10.0.19043)
  • Processor: AMD Ryzen 5 2600X, Intel Core i7-6800K
  • Memory: 16 GB RAM
  • Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 5700, NVIDIA GeForce 1070 Ti
  • DirectX: Version 12
  • Storage: 125 GB available space
  • Additional Notes: SSD Required

Recommended Specs:

  • OS: Windows 10/11 with updates
  • Processor: AMD Ryzen 5 3600X, Intel i5-10600K
  • Memory: 16 GB RAM
  • Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
  • DirectX: Version 12
  • Network: Broadband Internet connection
  • Storage: 125 GB available space
  • Additional Notes: SSD Required
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Is it still 30 fps on Series X? I don't think that's acceptable for a first-person game in 2023.

[–] beefcat@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You say that, but Immortals of Aveum probably would have benefited immensely from a 30 FPS option.

[–] lustrum@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even more from a 40FPS option.

[–] PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I didn't follow this game. Can you explain why a lower frame rate is desirable here? Is it just too demanding to run at 60+?

[–] beefcat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It is the first shipping UE5 game that uses both Nanite and Lumen, and with insanely detailed environments to boot. It holds a pretty stable 60 FPS on the PS5, but it runs at 720p internally and upscales to 4k using FSR2, resulting in some very questionable image quality.

I think these features are insanely cool and their commitment to supporting 60 FPS is commendable, but this really is a case where I would actually prefer 30 or 40 FPS with better visuals.

[–] lustrum@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

It's 720p on PS5 then upscaled. It runs ok at 60FPS. But the Res is simply too low for me

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not going to get better unless companies start making consoles with 1-2 year life cycles (which won't sell, because at that point, you may as well be swapping parts out of your PC of Theseus).

[–] NuPNuA@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why? If the game has been targetted at 30 though development and everything built around that it should be fine.

[–] PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

You really believe that? Have you played New Vegas at 30 and 60 fps? Go ahead and try it out. I'll wait.