this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
518 points (94.8% liked)

News

22896 readers
4744 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] melc@feddit.nl 63 points 1 year ago (2 children)

One of the issues with following a crime rate is that it perpetuates discrimination.

Even if two groups have the exact same probability of, for example, carrying illegal substances, racist targeting will mean your crime rate will continue to reflect that one group “seems worse”.

You don’t spot crime where you dont look for it.

That’s why it’s important to tackle these issues and make sure there is no racial targeting.

[–] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

As an example:

Imagine, for the sake of argument, both white people and black people have a 50% chance of possessing weed (not that weed should even be criminalized, but you get the idea).

Now also let's take a group of 100 people, assuming 80 are white and 20 are black. Given the above weed possession rate, we can say there are 40 weed-carrying white people and 10 weed-carrying black people.

Now imagine cops last year searched 20% of the total population, 90% of those searched being black and 10% being white. Thus, last year, 18 black people were searched and only 2 white people. Of these searched people, 9 black people were caught in possession of weed vs 1 white person.

Thus, the newspapers can now publish "9 black criminals for every 1 white criminal!", and so the police decide to continue mostly searching black people this year.

Same underlying crime rates, but searching one demographic more skews the resulting arrest record and seemingly justifies further discriminatory enforcement.

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't even need to imagine it when every study shows that is an accurate description.

[–] Gumbyyy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Sure, but a lot of people need it very clearly spelled out for them.

[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

What a wonderful, easy to understand example. Thank you for this

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yep.

If you're only stopping people in cargo shorts to search them for drugs, you're only going to find drugs on people wearing cargo shorts.

Doesn't mean they're the only ones carrying drugs around. They're just waaaaay more likely to get caught because they're the ones getting searched

[–] realcaseyrollins@kbin.projectsegfau.lt 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That makes sense. Do you think that there's a large amount of drug crime among white folks that is presently being ignored?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I know from my days as a young white guy that enjoyed extracurricular activities that I could do damn near anything in front of cops while smelling like extracurricular activities and cops never hassled me...

Meanwhile my Black friends constantly got hassled even if they never broke laws.

Cops see nervousness as indication of guilt. So if you're afraid of cops (because they may kill you over nothing) the cops are going to see that as reason to hassle you.

Even if it's not explicit racism on the cops behalf, the racist environment of policing means it's going to affect how they do their job and who they hassle. That's why people keep saying it's a systemic issue.

Cops are a lot like dogs or wild animals. They don't often use higher logic like normal people. Because they're trained to "trust their gut" even tho absolutely no science backs it up. It's easy and makes them feel smart, so that's what they do.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

No cop ever searched me for drugs, even when I obviously smelled like weed. Total white privilege.

[–] GnothiSeauton@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Weird how you keep asking "questions" like this after you were already shown that the stops were extremely disproportionate. It's almost like you didn't care about the answers to the questions at all, and were just using "questions" as a vehicle to insert your already formed opinions.

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

Lol, true. Let me show you how a real man deals with this troll the Rex Kwan Do way.

Come at me with a "question".

"Why don't they just follow the rules like everyone AHH!"

See, I just block and walk away. Block and walk away.