this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2023
171 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

59080 readers
4184 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
171
AMD denies blocking Bethesda from adding DLSS to Starfield | Starfield DLSS mod locked behind a paywall (www.techspot.com)
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
33 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

AMD denies blocking Bethesda from adding DLSS to Starfield | Starfield DLSS mod locked behind a paywall::undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No but that's not really a concern. Unless the frame generation is signicantly effecting the real frame rate you will get smoother motion with similar latency as without it. It's probably not ideal for competitive games where you want motion to be 1:1 but it's probably good enough for more casual ones.

[โ€“] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

It's hard for old peeps like me to let frames go. Wolf:ET on a 333mhz compaq was hell and I've been chasing frames since.