this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2023
259 points (96.8% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2545 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A White gunman who killed three Black people at a Jacksonville Dollar General store Saturday legally purchased the two firearms used in the racially motivated attack, local law enforcement confirmed.

The man, identified Sunday as 21-year-old Ryan Christopher Palmeter of Clay County, Fla., on Saturday drove to Edward Waters University, a historically Black college, but was refused entry, according to the school. He then drove to the nearby store, where he opened fire using an AR-15-style rifle inscribed with Nazi insignia, authorities said.

Police described a methodic rampage that lasted less than 11 minutes and killed Angela Michelle Carr, 52; Anolt Joseph Laguerre Jr., 19; and Jerrald De’Shaun Gallion, 29.

Jacksonville police on Sunday said law enforcement had been called about Palmeter previously in a domestic incident, and he also had been held during a mental health crisis. But those cases did not result in a criminal record, so there was no legal reason to stop him from acquiring the guns he purchased this year between April and July.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 77 points 1 year ago (4 children)

"law enforcement had been called about Palmeter previously in a domestic incident, and he also had been held during a mental health crisis"

God forbid we have red flag laws in this country. They only make perfect sense and enjoy majority support among Americans.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

ERPOs are shit. Dude was held on a mental health hold, that should have been flagged in the BGC...and if the fucking NICS would be opened to anyone so you can run a BGC on people you sell firearms to, this would have way more effective than ERPOs that do nothing but give police even more reasons to do knocks and get people killed.

[–] nocturne213@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

God forbid we have red flag laws in this country. They only make perfect sense and enjoy majority support among Americans.

Because of the gun lobby. They pay big money to ensure stuff like this does not happen.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Make guns easy to get, so all the unarmed people will be afraid of the people with guns. A lot of them will buy guns to protect themselves from the other people with guns. And the circle continues until everyone is armed to the hilt all the time.

They know how to sell guns.

[–] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

domestic incident

Previous incidents included a 2016 domestic call to his home that did not result in an arrest, police said.

mental health crisis

A year later, he was temporarily detained for emergency health services under Florida's Baker Act law.

So the shooter, Palmeter, was 21. This means the little they were able to dig up about his past comes from when he was 15 years old.

[–] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Supreme Court to Consider Whether Domestic Abusers Can Own Guns

At issue is a 1994 amendment to the Federal Firearms Act that prohibits those who are actively subject to domestic violence restraining orders from possessing firearms.

California's gov. Newsom is hellbent on changing this. Gov.CA - Newsom to Supreme Court: Uphold Law The state is having to fight these federal laws, too, as in their state they want to even more restrict the right of Domestic Abusers from owning firearms - good reason, too LA times: domestic abusers can still own firearms