this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2023
398 points (85.8% liked)
Technology
59340 readers
5096 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I think it is still pretty decent at "coding", but it used that I could throw almost anything at it about virtually anything and most of the time there was no hallucinations if the prompt was good. It has always been prone to beong influenced by biased prompts so you had.to work around that.
Lately I feel like I really need to draw out answers out of it. You have to insist to get past the cookie-cutter reponses and all the newly added "I am not a specialist therefore I refuse to answer". Historical questions are often refused too if deemed offensives. But really, its been unable to give me all sort of general facts like it used too by lying about the cutoff date of 2021, even after being corrected and apologizing. Some answers are purely 100% hallucinations. Its never been perfect but it used to be better than googling, well not anymore imo. It is still probably decent for non-historical questions, like coding.
My experience mirrors this, though I don't use it for much beyond a specific use case... I'm wondering why they neutered it so much?