this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2023
212 points (98.2% liked)
Open Source
31276 readers
684 users here now
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Useful Links
- Open Source Initiative
- Free Software Foundation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- It's FOSS
- Android FOSS Apps Megathread
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
- !libre_culture@lemmy.ml
- !libre_software@lemmy.ml
- !libre_hardware@lemmy.ml
- !linux@lemmy.ml
- !technology@lemmy.ml
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Right now I believe the plan is for SiDock to fund much of the expensive part once they have a very strong candidate. They are already doing some wetlab work for example.
There is no patent on the drug, that is kind of the point, it is designed to be patent free. The results of SiDock's research are published in an open-source manner. Any company that wants to could then manufacture and sell the drug, but obviously they can’t price gouge since any other small drug manufacturer could come along and undercut them. As you can imagine, there would be quite a big market for a potent, shelf-stable anti-viral for covid, particularly if it had a better side effect profile than paxlovid. Paxlovid is also quite expensive, if an alternative anti-viral was available, the competition would bring down Paxlovid's price, which would be a win for everybody.