this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2023
681 points (99.6% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5294 readers
461 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7
681
The world's corporations produce so much climate change pollution, it could eat up about 44% of their profits if they had to pay damages for it (phys.org)
submitted 1 year ago by silence7 to c/climate
81 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Commiunism@lemmy.wtf 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What would that even do? Sure, you can tax the companies for their CO2 emissions, but they'd still be in profit, and monetary compensation to the state won't make the CO2 disappear. Money isn't some magical paper that will suddenly reduce carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere if you throw it in the air, it's just a currency, banked labor hours.

[โ€“] SeaJ@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

It would discourage CO2 emissions immensely. The tax money could also be used to promote green technology that do not emit nearly as much CO2 and also possibly plants that pull carbon out of the atmosphere.