Green Energy

2283 readers

4 users here now

Everything about energy production and storage.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

poVoq

SteveKLord

174

New research shows renewables are more profitable than nuclear power (www.pv-magazine.com)

submitted 1 year ago by pizzaiolo to c/energy

62 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Claidheamh 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Renewables are incredibly cheaper to build, come online orders of magnitude faster, are completely non-centralized

All true.

require massively less infrastructure

Not true. In fact, very much the opposite is true, nuclear plants are vastly more compact.

have no millennium length waste storage dangers

Neither does nuclear, really. Waste storage is a non-issue, that has had effectively zero observable impact over the decades we've been doing it.

But the bottom line is that this is a distraction. The longer we continue focusing on short term profit, repeating the previous generations' mistakes, the harder it will be to get to zero emissions. Nuclear and renewables are not mutually exclusive. The more diverse our energy sources, the more robust our fossil-fuel free grid will be.

[–] schroedingershat@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Not true. In fact, very much the opposite is true, nuclear plants are vastly more compact

Distributed solar and agrivoltaics have 0 or negative land use and require less material than a nuclear reactor. Whereas low-yield uranium resource (like Inkai) has a lower area specific power than a dedicated utility solar install.

Distributed solar + battery also has the effect of massively reducing strain on transmission. A household that previously had a summer peak consumption of 20kW, a summer average of 2kW and a winter max daily average of 1kW can now be fed with 800W of transmission instead of 20kW. Results are less extreme in high latitude but it can still halve.

[–] dmrzl@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And if I might add: access to large amounts of water is also an infrastructure and France is already running out of it.

[–] schroedingershat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Also true.

Along with an enrichment industry (building one rather than paying russia will get your country coup'd, bombed or cyberattacked), and waste processing/permament storage (of which there is one small token facility in finland that might work, and numerous projects that failed to contain their waste and had to be cleaned for hundreds of millions to billions).

Then there is the milling and mining waste which is usually abandoned on indigenous land or in a developing country.