this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
55 points (98.2% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5375 readers
1033 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
silence7
55
US Democrats and Republicans deeply divided on extreme weather, Post-UMD poll finds (wapo.st)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by silence7 to c/climate
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Partisans remain split on climate change contributing to more weather disasters, and whether their weather is getting more extreme

What's driving a lot of this is different coverage. Eg: 4/5 the total TV News coverage of climate protest in the US consists of Fox running inactivist segments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The framing of this as a difference of opinion or view bothers me. You wouldn't use this framing for a math problem, "Partisans divided on 1+1=2" , because it perpetuates the idea that there are two reasonable sides. Media needs to start being more responsible in framing these findings, how about "Republicans more likely to be wrong about causes of extreme weather".

[–] Kichae@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, but the media isn't going to be responsible about this so long as it's owned by the same companies that are profiting off of environmental destruction.

[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

True enough