this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
327 points (81.1% liked)

Technology

59414 readers
2831 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Each of these reads like an extremely horny and angry man yelling their basest desires at Pornhub’s search function.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] urist@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m not making an argument to ban it. I’m just pointing out you’re pretending a model from text someone wrote is similar to a model that makes nonconcentual porn.

I don’t think it can be banned, it’s just something they will need to encorperate into revenge porn laws, if it isn’t already covered.

I’m just pointing out your comment sucked.

[–] diffuselight@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It’s already covered under those laws. So what are you doing that’s different from ChatGPT hallucinating here ?

Those laws don’t spell out the tools (photoshop); they hinge on reproducing likeness.

[–] urist@lemmy.blahaj.zone -5 points 1 year ago

Oh good, someone who has read every revenge porn law, ever. I’m glad they work exactly the same, in every nation and state.

Anyway, I must be hallucinating, true, because it seems you keep attacking what I’m saying, instead of defending the comment you made earlier that I took issue with, the one that points out you’re being needlessly hostile.