this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
694 points (95.4% liked)

Technology

59647 readers
2854 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

OpenAI now tries to hide that ChatGPT was trained on copyrighted books, including J.K. Rowling's Harry Potter series::A new research paper laid out ways in which AI developers should try and avoid showing LLMs have been trained on copyrighted material.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] uzay@infosec.pub 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I hope OpenAI and JK Rowling take each other down

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Sticky this comment

[–] Touching_Grass@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What's the issue against openAI?

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They used to be a non profit, that immediately turned it into a for profit when their product was refined. They took a bunch of people's effort whether it be training materials or training Monkeys using the product and then slapped a huge price tag on it.

[–] Touching_Grass@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

I didn't know they were a non profit. I'm good as long as they keep the current model. Release older models free to use while charging for extra or latest features

[–] BURN@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They’re stealing a ridiculous amount of copyrighted works to use to train their model without the consent of the copyright holders.

This includes the single person operations creating art that’s being used to feed the models that will take their jobs.

OpenAI should not be allowed to train on copyrighted material without paying a licensing fee at minimum.

[–] uzay@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Also Sam Altman is a grifter who gives people in need small amounts of monopoly money to get their biometric data

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

So hypothetical here. If Dreddit did launch a system that made it so users could trade Karma in for real currency or some alternative, does that mean that all fan fictions and all other fan boy account created material would become copyright infringement as they are now making money off the original works?

[–] Touching_Grass@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

If they purchased the data or the data is free its theirs to do what they want without violating the copyright like reselling the original work as their own. Training off it should not violate any copyright if the work was available for free or purchased by at least one person involved. Capitalism should work both ways