this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
442 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

59436 readers
3359 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ilikepornaddict@lemmynsfw.com -4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The article is literally laying a path forward while still using ships. The fuck are you on about?

[–] mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You should re-read what you responded to. They said that sea shipping is already less polluting than other methods.

[–] Ilikepornaddict@lemmynsfw.com -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, if you tried to scale them up to meet ship capacities, but even the idea of that is ludicrous. Container ships are one of the largest polluters that exist, hopefully this technology can reign that in. Their argument sounds like whataboutism to me.

[–] kmkz_ninja@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Do you read anything at all before you respond to it?

The fuck are you on about?

Perhaps if you read my comment you'd be able to work it out