this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
55 points (96.6% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5279 readers
645 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7
55
Republican US Senator Cassidy proposes 'foreign pollution fee' to stem climate change (www.cnn.com)
submitted 1 year ago by silence7 to c/climate
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

He's been talking about it for months, but looks like he's going to actually introduce it. An embedded-emissions tariff like this was proposed during early draft outlines of Build Back Better, but didn't survive negotiation.

I'll note that his idea of 'more methane gas instead of coal' is something which might have been a reasonable intermediate step 30 years ago. It's not now, in a world where wind and solar are the cheap option.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pizzaiolo 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's funny how Republicans must always find the racist/xenophobic angle of any issue and run with it.

In this case it might actually be OK, just because we're in a climate emergency.

I do wonder what Americans would say if China slapped a similar tariff to their products, though. It might be the closest we can get to a carbon tax, lol.

[–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 5 points 1 year ago

We know from our experiences with Trump’s idiocy that China definitely WOULD retaliate with tariffs of their own, to the detriment of everyone except the demagogues getting votes out of it but ESPECIALLY the working class of both countries.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It would effectively be a carbon tax, but not for US companies, right? That's better than no carbon tax in my book.

[–] pizzaiolo 6 points 1 year ago

Exactly. Let's hope other countries get mad and create their own tariffs.