this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
143 points (80.2% liked)

Asklemmy

43741 readers
1865 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Telegram is just actually superior in terms of features I don't get it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] akulium@feddit.de 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Telegram let's you send 2gb files, and stores them forever. Signal has a 100mb limit.

It also used to be easier to set up on multiple devices at the same time, but I believe that Whatsapp and Signal have improved that by now too.

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'm not sure the file limitations are much of a factor when 100mb covers most files that would need to be sent through a messaging service. There are plenty of dedicated services for sharing larger files.

[–] akulium@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mentioned it because it was an annoying limitation for me. 100mb is not a lot for media and zip files nowadays. And I don't know any good free services that will work more conveniently than simply sending with Telegram, suggestions welcome.

[–] claymore@pawb.social 2 points 1 year ago

https://toffeeshare.com/ is what I usually use for big files. But both sender and receiver need to be online for the whole transfer. It doesn't store anything you send on their servers, but that's a feature for me Β―\_(ツ)_/Β―

[–] greyscale@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Piracy tho. I can go to my telegram, search a movie title and click play and it just works.

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If the file size is under 2GB I guess, which is ehhh

[–] greyscale@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

4GB if the sender was premium, which they will be.

I don't care if its 720p if it just works.

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tbh I'll want it to be decent 1080p

[–] greyscale@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago
[–] NENathaniel@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s the point tho, it negates the need for dedicated services for sharing larger files

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why not use an encrypted service to send files though?

[–] NENathaniel@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago
  1. It's encrypted, just not E2E encrypted

  2. A lot of the time the files i'm sending are game clips or parts of Youtube videos. i want good quality above privacy

[–] BuckShot686@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

Why switch platforms if all your data is still being collected? This just provides another business with your data to sell and possibly have hacked. Sure, Telegram offers encryption, but it's not enabled by default even though they advertise it thoroughly. This demonstrates they're taking advantage of peoples desire for privacy simply to increase their user base while making the users + contacts do all the work.

As far as file sharing, with ProtonDrive I can use any messaging service and send a 500GB file if I wanted, fully encrypted with password protection and an expiration date. Telegram keeping the files forever doesn't seem like a benefit either.