this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
107 points (100.0% liked)

196

16503 readers
2623 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] toothbrush@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

hmm, I imagine the then 2 prevalent systems of neoliberal capitalism and soviet-style "communism" to be a pretty terrible combination actually. Although I believe I get what he was trying to say about individual rights within an economy of the commons(or at least thats how I interpret it).

[–] Akagigahara@lemmy.akagigahara.site 4 points 1 year ago (8 children)

I can't follow, would you elaborate? Sounds like an interesting debate :)

[–] toothbrush@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The funny combination would be to combine the single party authoritarian structure with a completly unregulated economy for maximum carnage :P

As far as I underatand the quote, hes talking about needing a socialist system where the rights of individuals are respected and protected, but factories, housing etc is owned and and managed by the commons.

That kinda sounds like the goal of socialism to me, with a state managing the societal functions but the workers owning the means of production but still in a capitalist environment

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)