this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
770 points (95.8% liked)

politics

19159 readers
4771 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 279 points 1 year ago (5 children)

That is embarrassingly low.

[–] TigrisMorte@kbin.social 56 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sub 20% turn out for under 30's in TX is more embarrassing.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They’re bad, but Texans don’t vote. The laws don’t nearly begin to explain the turnout numbers.

[–] Dee@lemmings.world 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As a former Texan, it's quite difficult to vote. The work culture there makes it even harder but the state also purposely makes it as inconvenient as possible. If you're low income and don't have vacation time or anything like that it's really hard to get out and vote in-person. Now I'm in a state with mail-in voting by default and Texas makes me even more sick when I saw how easy it's supposed to be.

More people could definitely make more of an effort there, but the barriers to vote shouldn't be overlooked imo

[–] Radium@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Colorado? I grew up here and worry I don’t know how good I actually have it. I wouldn’t know where to begin if a ballot didn’t auto-magically appear in my mailbox. The system backing it up is so good that when it doesn’t show up magically, a new one is a phone call and a short walk away.

If I don’t want to put a stamp on my ballot, I walk a half mile to drop it off

[–] Dee@lemmings.world 5 points 1 year ago

Colorado?

Oregon! That's cool to learn that Colorado is set up the same way. I wish it was implemented on a national scale though.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Imagine if you lived in a state where voting in person is so quick and easy that’s it’s not worth sending in the mail in ballot automatically sent

[–] Dee@lemmings.world 6 points 1 year ago

I have that option too, I just like to not wear pants when I vote now. They frowned on that when I tried to do that in person.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Then what does? And what's the solution?

Because I don't buy that Texans are just inherently worse citizens.

[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I agree and…

Whyshouldistopyellingatyou?

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] msage@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] gornar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[–] match@pawb.social 6 points 1 year ago

Well, but it's progress, right?

[–] JeffCraig@citizensgaming.com 3 points 1 year ago

You're saying that about a population that literally voted this guy into office just a few years ago.

If people haven't realized how dumb our society is after that, there's not much hope.