this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
794 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37692 readers
397 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ParsnipWitch@feddit.de 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I wonder if and how wanting to protect the Wayback machine is compatible with the overall sentiment (on Lemmy) that people need all necessary means to protect their privacy. Wouldn't people who want that users can protect their privacy also be against the Wayback machine?

[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You can already ask the Internet Archive to take down a content if you can proof the content is yours (e.g. can't just buy an old domain and demand the internet archive to delete the archived contents put up by the past owners). People also regularly ask them to take down harmful contents as well.

[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

(e.g. can’t just buy an old domain and demand the internet archive to delete the archived contents put up by the past owners)

This is false. My father owned a particular domain that transferred ownership to me. I was able to pull down stuff from prior to my ownership just fine without providing any evidence.

[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wait, you just asked the Internet Archive to take down stuff, and they complied without asking for proof of ownership? This seems to run counter with their own guidelines.

[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No... I took down content from a previous owner. So you can absolutely buy an old domain and demand to take down old content.

I just pulled up the email. The only evidence I gave them is that I emailed them from the "contact webmaster" email address that was posted on the main site page (admin@domain.com).

They removed everything from their archive completely relating to both domains I was inquiring about. One being originally my fathers and that was transferred to me completely.

[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's a bummer. Nissan can then buy nissan.com when it's expired (the owner died recently) and erase the old posts from the previous domain owner detailing their legal battle with Nissan for example.

[–] astraeus@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

This already happened but it wasn’t the automotive company that took it down, if you look at the page now it’s an advertisement for some “AI-driven” advertising thing

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not at all, because the Wayback machine only archives things that are published.

[–] renard_roux@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Although not necessarily published by the rights holder...

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Oh good point.