-16
The World Health Organization, together with the UN,promote pedophilia
(mac417773233.wordpress.com)
this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
-16 points (13.6% liked)
WorldSocialists
3 readers
1 users here now
educational and informative community for socialists/communists all over the world to stay informed on and discuss recent developments on the globe and adjacent areas with regards to socialism and the workers movement. We are first and foremost an anti-imperialist sub that acknowledges that the biggest enemy of the global proletariat is imperialism. Led by the Marxist Anti-imperialist Collective, read more about this here! https://mac417773233.wordpress.com/
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
From being around plenty of childeren. Some of them can start doing it at a very young age just because it feels nice, not from seeing it or understanding it, just from being human and having genitals. The right thing to do is to talk to them about their body, what it is that they are doing and why it is wrong to do in public.
But wouldn't it be nice if the fate of a child would have more then one support system? Like if the parents are bad maybe the school system can help the child... And yeah I agree, parents that don't educate their children about sex as they grow up (at a fitting level for each age) are failing their child and are partially (if not fully) to blame for bad outcomes of uneducated sex. And I don't need to explain why parents that rape their child are a failure to humanity.
This is an anecdote, i might as well reply with my own anecdote of not seeing such behaviour, both carry as much weight. If one is to base education of children on this notion, there needs to be a study to prove it.
Yes and thats the whole point of this post, to criticise the bourgeois education system. Seems to me that you've interpreted my critique of the bourgeois education system as demanding there to be no sex education to begin with. Of course there needs to be sex education, but based on materialism and collectivism, ie. marxism. Just look at socialist states for inspiration, like the DPRK. "Sex education" in the imperialist West is based on an individualist ideal of sex only existing for pleasure, with procreation merely as an option, when a marxist recognizes the primary function of sex as procreation, with pleasure merely existing to encourage this. There are then other conclusions that are drawn from whichever view one has, mainly having to do with relationships.
https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/124/3/992/71844/Clinical-Report-The-Evaluation-of-Sexual-Behaviors
And there are more, just do some research.
Tell me, do you take bourgeois economists who've "disproven marxism" seriously?