MichaelLanne2

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
 

In this matter (the expansion of Soviet borders) we admittedly went a bit too far, but something has been brewing in the south. You have to understand that there are limits to everything, otherwise you can choke.

The problem of the Baltic states, western Ukraine, western Belorussia, and Bessarabia we solved with Ribbentrop in 1939. The Germans reluctantly agreed to our annexation of Latvia, Estonia, and Bessarabia. A year later when I was in Berlin, in November 1940, Hitler asked me, “Well, good, you are uniting the Ukrainians, uniting the Belorussians, all right, and the Moldavians, that’s reasonable—but how are you going to explain the Baltic states to the whole world?”

I said to him, “We’ll explain.”

Communists and the people of the Baltic states favored joining the Soviet Union. Their bourgeois leaders came to Moscow for negotiations but refused to sign such an agreement with the USSR. What were we to do? I must tell you confidentially that I pursued a very hard line. I told the Latvian minister of foreign affairs when he came to visit us, “You won’t go home until you sign the agreement to join us.”

A popular minister of war from Estonia came to see us—I’ve forgotten his name. We told him the same thing. We had to go to such extremes. And to my mind, we achieved our aims quite satisfactorily.

This sounds crude in the telling, but in fact everything was done more delicately.

But the first one could have warned the others.

There was no escape for them. A country somehow has to see to its security. When we laid down our demands—you have to act before it’s too late—they vacillated. Of course bourgeois governments could not join a socialist state with alacrity. But the international situation was forcing their decision. They found themselves between two great powers—fascist Germany and Soviet Russia. The situation was complicated. That’s why they wavered, but finally they made up their minds. And we needed the Baltic states....

-Molotov Remembers, Inside Kremlin Politics, 1993.

 

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/08969205221137765

Interesting, this seems to be from a Trotskyite author (and actual Trotskyite, not one who uses a Trotskyist clothe to justify Imperialism, liberalism and smear campaigns against "Stalinism", but he does the common mistakes of Trotskyites regarding Fascism where he is into "Muh Trump" and "muh rainbows") but still viable answer to the eclectic David Harvey.

 

It seems our analysis from 2 weeks ago holds complete truth in it :

As we did for the Malian and Burkinabè revolutions, we look very favorably on the recent Revolution in Niger, which will probably allow the establishment of a national-bourgeois anti-imperialist government. This is proven by the demonstrations supporting the coup, chanting “Down with France, long live Russia”.

The reaction from French, American and UN imperialists, all supporting the deposed comprador bourgeois president, also demonstrate intense fear on the part of the parasitic West, afraid that the last oil and uranium colony of the Sahel will now be free of its movements.

We can wonder why Russia has a half-hearted reaction, but we must distinguish between the politics of the right-wing faction of the national bourgeoisie represented by Shoigu, and that of the left-wing faction represented by Prigozhin, having supported the Nigerien movement as than liberation of the colonized.

Above all, it demonstrates that it is not “false conscience” that leads people to reject anti-colonialism, but class interests, explaining why the technically more educated French workers are always supporters of a social-fascist methods, while Nigeriens want a real national doctrine (their links with Russia probably explained by the brotherhood once professed by the Soviet Union towards the peoples of the Third World). Perhaps an imperialist nation, an old leader of the Euro Zone and of the CFA Franc has different interests from a colony that is part of Françafrique?

May this revolt be part of a broad worldwide revolutionary movement!

Let’s hope national and proletarian interests of Nigerians will still be protected from ECOWAS’ hands!

-1
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by MichaelLanne2@lemmy.world to c/worldsocialists@lemmy.world
 

1. The right to ask questions

The visitors of the community have the right to ask questions in good faith, either in the form of post marked by the flair Question/Debate or comments, which are relevant to the community and does not have the tendency to cause a brigade. The interpretation of these is up to the moderation team whose duty, in this case, is to ensure healthy discussions in the community.

2. Strike Rules

In the events of rule breaks the moderation team may give a strike and after three strikes they may ban the users. The moderation team reserves the right to use bans without strikes in the event where the brigading or the trolling/bad faith of the user is obvious. In this case the moderation team should clearly indicate in a mod comment that it will do so.

3. Rules of arguments

This community is open to reasonable debates about subjects related to socialism, Marxism, and anti-imperialism with substantial evidence for criticisms but does not tolerate baseless attacks against the mentioned concepts as well as against another visitor of the sub. Therefore, the followings are considered a violation of rules: Promotion of Anti-communist ideas, Injection of Bourgeoise ideals into Marxism and personal attacks against another user (such as those based on: Sex, Ethnicity, nation, or religion).

4. Relevancy

A post must be relevant to the community, and a comment must be relevant to the topic of the post. Those contents that violate this are removed and for repeated offense the moderation team may use its rights as described by rule 2.

5. Memes :

This is not a meme sub. If you want to post low effort memes, you can do so in countless other subs. But if a user wants to post something more high effort that resembles more a propaganda poster, we may allow this. But we still maintain the final say in whether to approve or remove as we see fit.

6. On non-English content :

If you do post an article in a foreign language you have to flair it with the specific flair of the language that the article is written in. This flair could also be used on an English article about a specific non-English country. Also, users are encouraged to post the auto translated google translate versions, or at least post this version on the comments.

7. On posts from the same organization/party/platform etc.

Posts from the same YouTube channels, parties, blogposts, platforms etc. can only be posted at a maximum number of 2 per week, with exceptions made upon contacting the moderation team.

8. On trolling

This rule bans trolling, defined as behaviours or actions designed to sow discord, disrupt or derail the community in ways not covered by other rules. This could include (but is not limited to) posting obviously offensive materials or comments, numerous low-quality posts, posting content that is obviously unacceptable in other ways, low-level harassment (e.g. inappropriate name calling), and derailing discussions.