I love mine and use it almost all the time. Its a Surfans f20 with rockbox native installed. Makes it feel like I'm using my old ipod lol
this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2023
11 points (100.0% liked)
Music
7302 readers
9 users here now
Discussion about all things music, music production, and the music industry. Your own music is also acceptable here.
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Those are all fair points! I guess my priorities are just different, in the sense that I care about the convenience of having to carry just one device in my pocket.
On the topic of audiophiles, does quality really have such a big effect on the enjoyability of a song? Personally I'm perfectly fine with listening to 320kbps or even 256kbps through Bluetooth headphones.
A 320kbps or 256 VBR mp3 is pretty decent, and if it is going over BT then the BT headphones play the role of the DAC in a way. So, if the headphones are OK then the sound will be OK. So far I only notice differences on my favourite albums and certain genres. Like country, folk, and especially bluegrass sound a lot better when I find a lossless 24bit version than the 320kbps mp3. Metal as well, and a handful of electronic and classic rock albums.
I've always found it interesting that I cannot stand Nine Inch Nails on my BT headphones, but I really enjoy The Downward Spiral on my father's good studio headphones.
Oh NIN... One of my first albums was Further Down the Spiral. Wow. What a discovery. Mind blown.
Trent Reznor is a peculiar one though. He is opposed to digital music and thinks music should be enjoyed on a CD or vinyl. It wouldn't surprise me that his work is mastered in a way that favours certain formats.